But saying that pasing laws which overturn old laws is somehow underhanded or wrong might be the dumbest thing I've ever read on these forums. And I've seen a couple of Varus' posts.
It's not the overturning of laws I disagree with. It's the passing of inferior laws as replacements
that I disagree with. I never said it wasn't perfectly legal to do so, but that doesn't make it stink any less. Got it, champ?
That's pretty darn subjective though, isn't it? I mean, I get why *you* might think those replacements are inferior, but that doesn't make them so. Doubly so given that most of these are simply rolling back or eliminating changes to the law made in 2008/2009 by the Dems. Those laws were broadly considered by many in the state to be overreaches. It's at least partly because of the opposition to those things that the GOP gained power in the state.
Point being, whether you personally agree or not, the citizens of the state voted for the GOP to do exactly what they're doing: Eliminating law that the Dems passed that they people didn't agree with. I think it's somewhat absurd to pretend to be surprised when they do exactly that which they were voted into office to do.